This is a feature request of mine and I believe this would be a great upgrade to the tactics puzzle module for the following reasons:
1. There are currently many, many faulty problems. Problems where outright winning moves or moves that directly transpose to the winning line are marked incorrect. If I or others were to write a comment about each one it would just pollute this forum. Having the comments attached to the puzzle itself keeps everything self-contained.
2. I have largely abstained from voting up problems as I have observed that many of the faulty problems have a large positive voting record. This is due to users who have, through luck or insight, hit on the accepted solution without ever seeing the faulty side of the problem*. By seeing the grievances pointed out by other solvers we could make a more informed decision when voting on a puzzle.
* (Due to this I think a grading system would be better than the current unbounded voting system)
3. It would be useful as a learning tool for users to read the ideas of others in order to clarify why the solution works or why the non-solutions don't. Sure, we could use the "play against the computer" feature, but this is not a good substitute as it doesn't always amply explain why the moves work or do not and Stockfish does not always play the most testing or enlightening moves from a human perspective.
4. We would see others who have stumbled over the same ideas or found the same beauty in the solution and that's a good feeling :)
1. There are currently many, many faulty problems. Problems where outright winning moves or moves that directly transpose to the winning line are marked incorrect. If I or others were to write a comment about each one it would just pollute this forum. Having the comments attached to the puzzle itself keeps everything self-contained.
2. I have largely abstained from voting up problems as I have observed that many of the faulty problems have a large positive voting record. This is due to users who have, through luck or insight, hit on the accepted solution without ever seeing the faulty side of the problem*. By seeing the grievances pointed out by other solvers we could make a more informed decision when voting on a puzzle.
* (Due to this I think a grading system would be better than the current unbounded voting system)
3. It would be useful as a learning tool for users to read the ideas of others in order to clarify why the solution works or why the non-solutions don't. Sure, we could use the "play against the computer" feature, but this is not a good substitute as it doesn't always amply explain why the moves work or do not and Stockfish does not always play the most testing or enlightening moves from a human perspective.
4. We would see others who have stumbled over the same ideas or found the same beauty in the solution and that's a good feeling :)